Minggu, 29 Juni 2014

Pragmatics In Discourse Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Traditional language analysis contrasts pragmatics with syntax and semantics (See Widdowson,1996,for a general introduction to linguistic). Syntax is the area of language analysis that describes relationships between linguistic forms, how they are arranged in sequence, and which sequences are well formed and therefore grammatically acceptable Chapter 4 focuses on this type of linguistic knowledge and its relation to discourse.
Semantic is the area of language analysis that describes how meaning is enouded in the language and is therefore concerned mainly with the meaning of lexical items. Semantic is also concerned with the study of relationship between language forms and entities in real or imaginary worlds (Yule,1996). Chapter 5 focuses on vocabulary and thus deals with some areas of semantic in relation to discourse.

Whereas formal analyses of syntax and semantics do not consider the users of the linguistic forms that they describe and analyze, pragmatics deals very explicitly with the forms. As such, pragmatics is concerned with people’s intentions, assumptions, beliefs, goals, and the kinds of actions they perform while using language. Pragmatics is also concerned with context, situation, and settings within which such language uses occur.
A language user’s lexicogrammatical competence is his/her knowledge of syntax and lexical semantics in the target language. In describing such competence we need to present the rules that account for the learner’s implicit formal knowledge of grammatical and vocabulary. Pragmatic competence, on the other hand, is a set of internalized rules of how to use language in socioculturally appropriate ways, taking into account the participants in a communicative interaction and features of the context within which the interaction takes place.

While lexicogrammatical competence can be described in formal term, pragmatic competence is at present a much less formalized and structured area of inquiry. Since pragmatic deals with human elements, it is less objective and more difficult to describe; thus formal language analysis tends to exclude pragmatics. In recent years, how ever, more attention has been directed toward pragmatic competence and even interlanguage pragmatics for L2 learners Blum-Kulka, et al, 1989; Kasper and Blum-Kulka, 1993), which is the learner’s developing pragmatic competence in the target language.