Minggu, 27 April 2014

Feature changing rules



The English vowel nasalisation and devoicing rules and the Japanese devoicing rule change feature specifications. That is, in English the [ - nasal] value of phonemic vowels is changed to [+ nasal] phonetically when they occur before nasals through a spreading process. Vowels in Japanese are phonemically voiced, and the rule changes vowels that occur in the specified environment into phonemically voiceless segments.
The rule we have discussed are phonetically plausible, as are other assimilation rules, and can be explained by natural phonetic process. This fact does not mean that all these rules have to be learned at all; they would apply automatically and universally, and therefore would not have to be included in the grammar of any particular language. They are not, however, universal.
There is a nasal assimilation rule in Akan that nasalises voiced stops when they follow nasal consonants, as shown in the following example :


The /b/ of the verb ‘come’ becomes an [m] when it follows the negative /m/. This assimilation rule also has a phonetic explanation; the velum is lowered to produce the nasal consonant and remains down during the following stop. Although it is phonetically ‘natural’ assimilation rule, it does not occur in the grammar  of English; the word amber, for example, shows an [m] followed by a [b]. A child learning Akan must learn this rule, just as a child learning English learns to nasalise all vowels before nasal consonants, a rule that does not occur in the grammar of Akan.
Assimilation rules such as those we have discussed in English, Japanese, and Akan often have the function of changing the value of phonetic features. They are feature-changing or feature-spreading rules. Although nasality is non-distinctive for vowels in English, it is a distinctive features of consonants, and the nasalisation rule therefore changes a feature value.
The Akan rule is a feature-changing rule tht states that [m] is an allophone of /b/ as well as an allophone of /m/.
There is no one-to-one relationship between phonemes and their allophones. This fact can be illustrated in another way :


We will provide more examples of this one-to-many or many-to-one mapping between phonemes and allophones below.